|
Wayfinding
and Rescue in Heavy Smoke or Blackouts:
Low
Tech Markings Outperform Sophisticated Concepts
Geir Jensen
InterConsult Group ASA
Newly recognized earth-borne pigments have made a ten-fold
improvement in luminance of photoluminescent (PL) wayfinding systems and removed
doubts of deficiency. The debate on sufficiently visible or not has shifted to
a discussion on how much the width of marking lines may be reduced and still conform.
Due to a comfortable margin for error new products tolerate minor
design flaws, periodic loss of charging light, blackouts in excess of 10 hours or
degradation caused by aging or dirt.
The superior reliability, low cost and unmistakable marking of
earlier zinc sulphide PL systems has been retained.
The PL manufacturing industry concern is to establish an
international standard of their own and to arrest public misconceptions of PL marking
versus powered emergency lighting.
Photoluminescent systems are
non-radioactive materials containing pigments that store energy from natural and
artificial lights. When the lights are
extinguished, the materials glow in the dark
by releasing this stored energy.
New Designs
The new PL (after-glowing) materials employ rare earth-borne pigments of
heavy metals such as strontium, barium, europium, boron, arsenic, mercury and cadmium.
Compared to conventional zinc sulphide PL the visible after-glow persist for 3 days rather
than 5 hrs, and the 60 min luminance
requirement is surpassed 10-20 times. 25-35mm strip widths may be as effective as
conventional 60-100mm strips. The IMO and DIN standards is yet to be upgraded.
The new PL comes along with new product designs such as afterglowing
handrails for use in utility service tunnels or complex industry structures. The PL material is moulded in special resins to
withstand harsh environments. At least
one manufacturer offer a 5 year warranty for offshore applications. They may be embedded
on site to decks of concrete protected by thermosetting top layers against impact from
vehicles or tools. Some lacks the dreaded PVC. They are UV-stable and may be used in
sunlight.
Improvements
Add Substantial Safety Margins to Underrated PL
PL marking has been a trusted concept
to provide reliable wayfinding in industry for decades.
At the start of the
90-ies researchers in Norway tested the performance of PL in smoky conditions against
powered lighting concepts. It was proven that
despite the relatively low afterglowing luminance PL was capable of outperforming their
high luminance electrically powered counterparts in the most severe smoke density.
The key factor is the short viewing
distance provided by linear also referred to as
proximity,delineation or continuous marking.
Strips of PL material identifies the escape route or rescue items located at floor,
skirting boards, threads or handrails (low location lighting) ensuring that
the viewing distance of evacuees never exceed roughly one meter when they are bending
slightly forward. Within this viewing range luminance is no longer important provided a
visible contrast only. Indeed, added
luminance may cause glaring and diffusion effects in smoke making visibility worse.
There was but one difficult
shortcoming of zinc sulphide PL: Luminance
was just barely sufficient at extreme smoke densities where they left no margins for
upright evacuees looking at floor markings or for the visually impaired. Conventional
wisdom stated the more luminance the better and many therefore mistakenly
preferred electrified lighting.
The high intensity PL materials offer
luminance with a safety margin. These wayfinding marking systems are even less susceptible
to design flaws, abuse or degradation over time than their predecessors. They require a longer activation time, but accept a low charging illuminance and the
brighter and long-lasting luminance makes up for this deficiency.
A stronghold of PL marking is the
underground power plant industry. Most of
Norways 863 hydro power plants are equipped with PL linear marking for wayfinding
and rescue operation in power outings or smoke. In Sweden an underground power plant
caught fire and two survivors insisted they would have perished without sticking to the PL
lines.
The new Oslo Gardermoen Airport is
equipped with the novel PL in underground areas, train terminal and tunnels. Both linear
marking and signs is made to perform better than 300/45 mcd/m2, surpassing
conventional zinc sulphide PL by a factor of 20. Tunnels challenge PL systems as charging
lights from passing trains and vehicles may be scarce.
Following the attack at the World
Trade Center in New York the high rise towers are provided with PL linear marking. All
lighting power supplies in stairwells broke down in 12 minutes. The evacuation in dense
smoke took seven hours.
The many hazards at North Sea Oil
Rigs require escape marking to be both effective and reliable. Disasters such as the Piper Alpha oil rig, the
Herald of Free Enterprise ferry and the Scandinavian Star ferry pointed at the hazards of
inadequate marking and power supplies. The new marking materials points to a definite
solution. The PL manufacturing industry express great expectations of increase in both
offshore and maritime applications.
When accidents involve fire,
explosion, collapse, short-circuiting or ingress of water all electrical systems including
emergency power supplies are at risk. Therefore, PL are increasingly used in road and
train tunnels.
It is no wonder then, that PL systems
have been tested and deemed adequate by FAA and the larger airlines to replace
electroluminescent marking of the aisles in aircrafts.
The heavy metal pigments fulfilled the requirement of 11 hours for longhaul
airplanes and provided intense visible delineation to the end of test at 16 hours.
Safe Escape and Rescue in Smoke
Emergency lighting and signage do not perform as expected
at fire disasters. Very often systems are
found to be nonoperative, not providing useful wayguidance or both. There are two common
denominators: the systems are traditionally not required to be designed for smoky conditions and they are prone to failure by
lack of maintenance or complexity.
A decisive factor to evacuees is the
time they become exposed to heavy smoke. This time is governed by the perceived
wayguidance of the evacuees - less by the length of the smoke filled escape route, which
is within 16 m only in 90% of fire disasters by statistics - therefore wayfinding systems
for smoky conditions play an important role.
One need to design
for wayfinding in smoke exceeding OD 1.5/m in some industry as well as some public
structures, contrary to current proposed
general limits of OD 0.4/m within some international standardization bodies.
At industry plants, underground installations and complex high risk
structures such as nuclear power plants or offshore drilling platforms visibility may
become crucial in severe smoke. In order to perform shutdowns, extinguish fires,
closing valves, rescue work or other intervening operations at imminent disaster, or
indeed when all things have failed, personnel may encounter very dense smoke, if ever so briefly.
Viewing distance, not power or luminance, is the crucial factor at high smoke density. This relies not on obscuration by distance alone,
but on the simple reason that visibility of any luminance must converge to zero at 100%
obscuration.
A photoluminescent
strip at 0.5 m distance to the eye is more visible than the most powerful luminaries at
just 1.5 m.
The
photoluminescent strip built into a directional handrail in test was 25 mm wide only, and
tilted to an angle of only 30o to the view direction. Amazingly, this
design performed well even at smoke densities between OD 1.4/m and 1.5/m, but is explained by the short viewing distance.
Without
respiratory protection the time available in severe smoke is approximately 50 seconds at a
mean travel speed of 0.35 m/s. This is
relevant to the 16 m length of escape in smoke which accounts for 90% of incidents. Thus,
given a good wayfinding system or a familiar route the life saving potential is very
substantial. This calls for Class I wayfinding systems (OD >1.5/m) and escape hoods or
breathing apparatus to prevent irritation of eyes and respiratory system.
Research recommend
fast escape in upright or forward bent walking mode.
Optimum system designs involve continuous marking at waist height, at skirting board or at the floor center
line.
|